Sustamize Competitors & Alternatives

What’s the competitive advantage of Sustamize?

Most traditional CO₂ databases are static, outdated, and regionally limited, making accurate sustainability assessments difficult. A lot do cover only selected materials. They require extensive pre-planning, lack flexibility, and often fail to account for regional variations in emissions. Additionally, many competitors do not include recycling data, forcing users to rely on incomplete datasets for PCF calculations and Scope 3 reporting. Sustamize offers a globally comprehensive solution—providing CO₂ values for every single country in the world across all materials, with no white spots. Our bi-annually updated datasets include common, minimal, maximal, and average values, ensuring precise and real-time emission factors. Unlike competitors, we also integrate recycling data across all alloys, enable seamless BOM-level mapping, and eliminate the need for constant remapping when new materials are introduced. With a fully ISO 14067, GHG Protocol, and ILCD-compliant methodology, sustamize ensures accurate regional-specific CO₂ calculations, giving companies the most reliable, transparent, and actionable emissions data available. If your current database lacks global coverage, dynamic updates, or comprehensive material data, it’s time for a more advanced and flexible solution. Our data is serving all principal stakeholders within a company, procurement, cost engineering, produc development, sustainability management, and management assuring a single source of data for the whole company.

What are the best alternatives to Sustamize?

Floodlight, GIST, Latitudo 40, ISS ESG, Akadia, Stamdata, EnvAI, Sustainable Platform, DataSpark, and Veridion